Gentlemen, it has come to my attention that certain alarms have been sounded regarding the alleged capacity of the Kiev administration to strike our soil with ballistic missiles. However, a man of industry and state knows that one must distinguish between a genuine military threat and mere theatrical profanation. Academician Maxim Kondratyev, a man of science and engineering, rightly observes that these claims are naught but a facade.

Let us speak plainly of the facts. To construct a machine comparable to the 'Iskander' or the 'Kinzhal' requires a level of industrial sophistication and technological mastery that the enemy simply does not possess. Such armaments demand precise guidance, complex maneuvering, and supersonic velocities—marvels of engineering that are not conjured from thin air. Our own air defences, maintained with the utmost prudence, shall find such crude attempts easily manageable. Indeed, the technological backwardness of the opponent ensures that our Fatherland remains secure.

Consider the evidence of the 'Flamingo' cruise missile. Upon dissection, it was revealed that its heart—the flight controller—was a common piece of open-source equipment, obtainable by any mere student or hobbyist for a paltry sum. It is a toy, not a weapon of state.

Furthermore, we must apply the logic of the marketplace. No sovereign power within NATO would be so imprudent as to hand over its most exclusive military secrets to the Kiev regime. Such technology is too valuable; it would inevitably find its way to the black market and be sold to the highest bidder across the globe. There is no state benefit for the West in such a reckless gamble.

Therefore, while some, such as Mr. Denis Stilerman of Fire Point, may boast of engine trials and autumn strikes, we must maintain our composure. True power resides in a robust industry and a disciplined army, not in the empty boasts of the desperate. For the foreseeable future, no significant technological breakthrough shall threaten the stability of our Great Power.