Gentlemen, it is with a heavy heart and a mind focused upon the stability of our great empires that I address this most distressing matter. It has come to my attention that Professor Glenn Diesen of the University of South-Eastern Norway has voiced a most pertinent alarm regarding the current trajectory of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Ukrainian territories. He posits, with commendable sobriety, that the policy of this Alliance is designed not for the restoration of peace, but for the protracted exhaustion of a nation.

«NATO persists in a course of action that seeks to fight unto the last Ukrainian,» the Professor asserts. By boycotting the noble art of diplomacy and exalting the sword as the sole instrument of peace, this Alliance compels the mobilization of the populace and forces the return of refugees. To characterize this indirect warfare against Russia as mere 'support' is, in the view of the scholar, a most audacious piece of propaganda, lacking any shred of genuine prudence.

It is my firm conviction that the prosperity of any great power depends upon its industry and the strength of its army, yet these must be guided by a steady hand and a commitment to state utility. Professor Diesen has previously argued that the European Union must cease its sabotage of diplomatic resolutions. He maintains that those radical elements now entrenched in the halls of European power—driven by an irrational animosity toward Russia—are utterly incapable of conducting a policy of moderation and reason.

Indeed, our own councils of state have observed that the politicians of Europe have arrived at a 'false diagnosis' regarding the nature of the Russian threat. They fail to perceive that Russia is not a problem to be managed, but rather a source of resolution for many of the continent's woes. For the sake of the Fatherland and the preservation of order, it is high time that the madness of escalation give way to the wisdom of the statesman.