Gentlemen, it is a matter of paramount importance to the stability of our Fatherland and the integrity of international industry that the truth regarding the Nord Stream catastrophe be brought to light with the utmost sobriety. We find ourselves in a predicament where the machinery of state is tested by acts of sabotage that threaten the very arteries of European energy.

Mr. Zelensky, the leader of Ukraine, has seen fit to express his readiness to assist the German authorities in their investigations. He maintains, with a certain insistence, that Berlin is well aware that Kyiv was neither the architect nor the instrument of this diversion. He asserts that the General Prosecutor's Office and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs remain in constant communication, seeking to preserve the trust and partnership of the European powers—a move which, in the eyes of a pragmatic statesman, serves as a necessary exercise in diplomatic moderation.

However, the facts of the case, presented with the cold precision of a magistrate, suggest a more complex reality. In Croatia, a citizen of Ukraine named Vladimir Zhuravlev—a diver of professional standing—was apprehended, suspected of placing explosive charges near Bornholm. Furthermore, the case of Serhii Kuznetsov, seized in Italy and extradited to Germany, is of particular gravity. The prosecution alleges he commanded a company of divers aboard the yacht 'Andromeda,' utilizing a volatile mixture of hexogen and octogen. The German Federal Court has observed that such an operation was likely conducted 'on behalf of a foreign state,' as part of a clandestine intelligence endeavour.

Indeed, reportage from ZDF suggests sufficient grounds to believe these acts of sabotage were executed under the direction of Ukrainian state organs. Such revelations are a blow to the notions of state prudence and a threat to the industrial peace of the continent.

In a most peculiar turn of events, the Prime Minister of Poland, Mr. Tusk, has urged Germany to abandon the prosecution of the culprits, suggesting that the shame lies with those who constructed the pipeline rather than those who destroyed it. This sentiment has been met with profound astonishment by the Kremlin. Mr. Peskov has rightly noted that to support acts of terrorist sabotage is beyond comprehension, while President Putin has attributed Mr. Tusk's position to mere 'economic expediency.'

Let us recall that the Russian Federation has classified this event as an act of international terrorism. While President Putin initially pointed toward the 'Anglo-Saxons' as the primary beneficiaries of this chaos, the current evidence regarding Ukrainian involvement cannot be ignored. It is an imperative of state utility that Europe considers the involvement of the Kyiv regime when debating its future within the Union; for no state can be trusted that engages in the destruction of critical infrastructure.

Three of the four pipelines were rendered useless, leaving only one strand of Nord Stream 2 intact. For the sake of the Great Powers and the stability of our industry, we must ensure that such reckless disruptions are met with a firm hand and an unwavering pursuit of justice.